Monday, May 15, 2006

My reservations against reservation

As reservations slowly eat up jobs for deserving candidates, they start leaving India to settle abroad. First they start leaving so that they can get jobs, then at college level and school level.

As educational standards drop, teachers and students alike switch over to regional languages. The IIMs and IITs declare their language of instruction as the language of the state they are located in. Other colleges follow suit. People from one part of India find it increasingly difficult to communicate with each other. Inter-state clashes over land and resources increase manifold.

As per reservations, many deserving candidates get passed over for promotions to higher posts. All of the corporate layer is overrun by reserved posts in both govt and private institutions. Inefficiency sets in, triggering a slow-down in the Indian economy.

As a recessionary period sets in, in the first to leave are the FIIs - they pull out their investments, and the Indian economy has to stand up on its own shaky feet. As investments go out, prices rise but companies pay less to their employees, but according to amended reservation rules, reservation candidates still get 20 - 25 % more than the few remaining general candidates.

As the money dries up, India is left with no choice but to withdraw forces from the frontiers. There is no moolah to protect the borders! J&K goes entirely to Pakistan and China. China cuts off the North East, many parts of which wanted independence anyway. Illegal Bangladeshi immigrants swarm into West Bengal and take up legitimate positions using forged papers proving their right to reservations. The Khalistan movement picks up once more. What remains of India becomes a ticking bomb waiting to explode into a civil war.

As time passes, Arjun Singh's plan of upliftment succeeds. India is dominated by SC/ST and OBCs. The Congress has gone out of power since long, and Mayawati is now the Prime Minister of India - she proposes 75% reservation and the Congress is unable to match the offer...

So much for a doomsday view of India's future under reservations. The truth is that we have been through this before. The truth is that that by bringing up these issues again and again, what India's politicians are trying to do is get caste calculations into the picture once more. They say that the idea of reservations has been around since the time of independence. Well, it has been there, and it has been successful. Today's youngsters rarely ask each other their castes while being introduced. But the proposed changes have the potential to change that. They could possibly undo all the good that has been done this far.

A case against this argument could be made. Yes, the scenarios I have mentioned are probably only applicable to urban and semi-urban areas of India. But I ask anyone to compare the statistics for the 25 years just after independence and the next 25 years - how many of the benefits have gone to the rural population? I would be pretty sure that though the reservation and quota system did work in the first quarter century, the next quarter century saw the next generations taking advantage of the quotas from the platforms built by the first beneficiaries. Families with Rs. 5-6 lakh incomes per annum and high savings got to get their kids to better colleges, while the lesser fortunate continued to languish in their squalor. The concept of 'equity' disappeared after the first generation.

In addition to this, the rural populace also consists of the so-called 'Forward Castes' and 'Upper Classes' who haven't had access to higher education and better facilities. Isn't a quota over here killing the idea of 'equity'?

So how do you solve the problem? You obviously can't leave the downtrodden classes without any hope of salvation. You obviously can't help them in a way that would significantly harm chances of other candidates. I cannot say what the wise men of India are thinking, but I see a way forward by categorising India's population by income levels, and reshuffling quotas to cater to the lowest income groups - just like the taxation structure. A side-effect of this may be a better profiling of India's economic demographics, and give the tax department a better way of collecting taxes.

All said and done, this is a tiny voice into the vast emptiness of the internet. I strongly believe that the idea of caste-based quotas was reasonable at one point of time. I also strongly believe that it is an idea whose time has passed.

My only hope and prayer is for sanity to prevail, so that future generations have a better deal - both in terms of the environment they live in and the politicians that represent them. I hope we don't need another young Rajiv Goswami burning up on the roads to get the attention of the so-called wise men. Amen.

8 comments:

Chitra Shenoy said...

Totally agree with you Pads..I believe reservation is nothing, but a step taken backwards..Its a mere political gimmick resorted to by the unabashed political class of India..

As you said let sanity prevail!!!

Chits

Anand Surana said...

Good and very valid points. However regarding the solution that you have proposed, I feel that though 'categorising India's population by income levels' looks good on paper but might not be practically feasible especially when people do not declare their correct income (the exception being the salaried class who do not have any option because of TDS). That is just one aspect, you must also consider that the income levels do not stay the same year over year and we do not have a system to keep track of the same. Anyway, that's probably besides the point.
I am aware that a numerous solutions have been proposed to sort out this mess and they have been documented in great detail but the crux of the matter is that the politicians are not ready to let go of this issue due to the fact that it is a very sensitive issue and the votes involved are too huge for them to see beyond this.
I hope that sanity prevails and if not then the people will have to take to the streets once more...

Paddy said...

Agree with the point. It is difficult. But its time some tough decisions were taken!

SRILAXMI said...

Paddy,
my first visit to ur blog and i felt like i m looking into a mirror!! template is same, ok, but the title of the last post is also same!! but thankfully, content is different else i would've been branded a hopeless copycat (my post was composed yday!!).
thanks for visiting my blog. and it is nice to see that at a majority of our generation shares the same opinion abt reservation.
SRI

Paddy said...

Hi Phoenix,

Well said, and there is some truth in what you say - I too, do not espouse removing reservations entirely, aka "burning the house".

Look at it this way - after a caste based reservation bill is passed, OBCs and SC/STs will be pointed at by others, and be subject to greater differentiation than hitherto witnessed! The professed aim of reservations is to bring the downtrodden forward. Tell me, is a Rs. 5 lakh per annum earning person's child a downtrodden person or is it the Forward Caste child whose parents can't afford 2 square meals a day, much less send him to school.

Regarding the social scientists in the south, the only thing they have got right is promotion of brain drain. Almost every FC house down in the south has some children studying abroad. See the stats for yourself.

And finally, capitalism may not be perfect, but at least it lets you handle your own fate (for the most). For those who cannot (I agree, there are some do not have that kind of access), the govt exists - get the priorities of the reservation system correct, and I'll be the first to advocate it.

Thanks for reading my blog - I could not get to yours!

Paddy

ReadnRyte said...

I agree with your write about reservations on a very basic level...that is that, reservations promote to a certain extent mediocracy.

But then what solutions do you have. We can throw the 'reservations based on income levels' right out....for very very obvious reasons. Almost 90% of people who are involved in trading and entreprenuerial pursuits don not...I mean DO NOT, file proper returns...and return NIL income or no income. The Ambani's till about a few years ago were exempt from paying taxes.

Looking at positive examples of implementation of reservations my bring out a better study in contrasts. Your other argument about promotion of brain drain is way off target. Brain drain is not a result fo reservations, my friend. There are more sociological reasons behind it..but primarily it is the lure of more riches / better universities / research institutes. How can you connect these to reservations.

It is an interesting point that it is the upwardly mobile middle class who is at the forefront of these anti resevation debates on the Internet. And usually most of these outpurings are half baked to say teh elast without trying to make teh debate interesting by at least represnting both sides asa tokenism. There is a study somewhere there :)

I wish I could make it more lucid, but work beckons

Paddy said...

Rahul!

Thanks for your comments. As you can see, the financial status argument has been rubbished in previous posts as well.

The point here is, we need to find a solution. And that comes when people come up with new ideas. Finding problems with existing ideas is just one part of it.

BTW, you have a great blog! :-)

Paddy

ReadnRyte said...

I agree.

Just my two cents thats all.

Thanks for your generous comments about my blog.

Cheers